Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Ackerman et al v. 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv11707
Plaintiff:
Betty Ackerman, Shelley Alexander, Richard Ammons, Sr and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller v. Bickham et al
as 3:2025cv00482
Petitioner:
Corey Miller
Respondent:
Edward Dusty Bickham, Elayn Hunt Correctional Center and Elizabeth Murrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malone v. Hunter et al
as 6:2025cv06054
Plaintiff:
Dawn Allison Malone
Defendant:
Noah Hunter, Mikayla, Corey Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Westcott et al
as 3:2024cv00889
Defendant:
Misty Stagg, Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections, Prison Enterprises, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weems (PS) v. Cementary Staff Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
Tyra Weems
Defendant:
Cementary Staff Georgia, Clifford Harriss, Jarvis Weems Knot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weems (PS) v. Arnold et al
as 1:2024cv01111
Plaintiff:
Tyra Weems
Defendant:
Monica Arnold, Tamieka Cottle, C Murder and others
Miller v. Hooper
as 23-30834
Petitioner / Appellant:
Corey Miller
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Miller v. Holmes et al
as 1:2023cv01252
Plaintiff:
Corey Miller
Defendant:
HSA Holmes, C. Nunnally, Nechol Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20671
Plaintiff:
COREY MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
