Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Johnson v. Boreago et al
as 3:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
Corey Ray Johnson
Defendant:
Boreago, L. Rodriguez, James Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mantooth v. Dynamic Directional Boring, LLC
as 3:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Corey Ray Mantooth
Defendant:
Dynamic Directional Boring, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
BUCHANAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02989
Plaintiff:
COREY RAY BUCHANAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALLEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv96208
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
COREY RAY ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2018cv01720
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Corey Ray Mitchell
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Puckett et al v. Walla Walla County et al
as 4:2016cv05074
Plaintiff:
Corey Ray Puckett and John Allen Smith
Defendant:
Walla Walla County, Humphries and Daschofsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridges et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv18141
Plaintiff:
Karen Elizabeth Bridges and Corey Ray Bridges
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2014cv00356
Plaintiff:
Corey Ray Mitchell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Logsdon v. White et al
as 1:2013cv00073
Plaintiff:
Corey Ray Logsdon
Defendant:
Daniel White , Graham Rutherford and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Poe v. Howell et al
as 5:2011cv00019
Plaintiff:
Corey Ray Poe
Defendant:
Kay Howell , Wendy Kelley , J Savoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
