Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Dove v. Gelsinger et al
as 1:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
Corey Lee Dove
Defendant:
Warden Denise Gelsinger, Corizen Medical Staff/Company, Warden Gregory Werner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Shamus v. Corizen Medical Services et al
as 2:2019cv00086
Defendant:
J. Cofield, Corizen Medical Services, Deborah Neff and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shamus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Volusia County Comminers et al
as 3:2019cv00648
Defendant:
Dr. Gil Peneita, Nurse Ebbers, Health Sweeney and others
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAYTON v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2018cv03101
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, CORIZEN MEDICAL, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN PAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2018cv00346
Plaintiff:
JAMES THOMAS SMITH
Defendant:
CORIZEN MEDICAL GROUP INC, A MARTINEZ, A ACOSTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. State of Florida, Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00175
Plaintiff:
James Thomas Smith
Defendant:
State of Florida, Dept. of Corrections, Brevard County and Corizen Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plunk v. Tulare County Medical et al.
as 2:2015cv02499
Plaintiff:
Shannon Plunk
Defendant:
Tulare County Medical, Tulare County Mental Health, Corizen Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plunk v. Tulare County Medical et al.
as 1:2015cv01820
Plaintiff:
Shannon Plunk
Defendant:
Tulare County Medical, Tulare County Mental Health, Corizen Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Guice, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00725
Plaintiff:
Mark Allen Jordan
Defendant:
Officer Guice, Leeposey Daniels, Officer Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Dobler et al
as 1:2015cv00132
Plaintiff:
Michael Brown
Defendant:
Dobler, Corizen Medical, Segadelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
