Cases 11 - 20 of 353
Russell Scott Walker v. State of Delaware, et al
as 23-2513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUSSELL E. SCOTT WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF DELAWARE, CITY OF MILFORD, MILFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1595
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CORNISH v. USA
as 1:2023cv00920
Plaintiff:
KHALIHAH CORNISH
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Cornish v. Frazier
as 5:2023ct03096
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Ryan Cornish
Defendant:
Michael D. Frazier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cornish et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv14352
Plaintiff:
Grady Cornish and Martha Cornish
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CORNISH V. BRITTAIN, ETAL
as 2:2023cv00380
Petitioner:
JOHN CORNISH
Respondent:
KATHY BRITTAIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBINSON v. ROBINSON ACKERSON
as 1:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
ALBERT THEODORE ROBINSON
Defendant:
SHERI LYNN CORNISH ROBINSON ACKERSON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Walker v. City of Harrington Delaware et al
as 1:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Russell E. Scott Walker and Scott Walker
Defendant:
City of Harrington Delaware, Duane Bivans, Joseph Perna and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
