Cases 1 - 10 of 333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Countryman v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01768
Plaintiff:
Gordon Countryman
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
WALKER v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
BRODRICK M WALKER
Defendant:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN and ANTONIE CALDWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHAH et al v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
VIRAJ SHAH, SATISHKUMAR PATEL, SHIVSENA GAMING LLC and others
Defendant:
GREG COUNTRYMAN, STACEY JACKSON, DAVID COOKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VAN NESS v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
KEVIS VAN NESS
Defendant:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN and Captain GLENDA HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN NESS v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00031
Petitioner:
KEVIS VAN NESS
Respondent:
Sheriff GREGORY COUNTRYMAN and MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Kemp et al
as 1:2024cv00965
Plaintiff:
Curtis Andrew Williams
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Tyrone Oliver, Michael W. Nail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN NESS v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
KEVIS VAN NESS
Defendant:
Sheriff GREGORY COUNTRYMAN, Lieutenant HARBERT, Sgt MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armer et al v. County of Montgomery et al
as NYN/1:24-CV-00259
Plaintiff:
Armer, Selena Reyes, Bruce Armer and others
Defendant:
County of Montgomery and Shawn J. Bowerman
Armer et al v. County of Montgomery et al
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Selena Reyes, Bruce Armer, Robert Murray and others
Defendant:
County of Montgomery and Shawn J. Bowerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
