Cases 1 - 10 of 29
The County of Westchester et. al. v. McKinsey & Company, Inc.
as 3:2021cv05467
Plaintiff:
The County of Westchester, The County of Allegany, The Town of Amherst and others
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company Inc and McKinsey & Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The County of Westchester et. al. v. McKinsey & Company, Inc.
as 2:2021cv03286
Plaintiff:
The City of Ogdensburg, The County of Otsego, The County of Yates and others
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
County of Albany et al v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01875
Defendant:
BAUSCH HEALTH AMERICAS, INC., TARO PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC, UDL LABORATORIES INC. and others
Plaintiff:
County of Schuyler, City of Mobile, WCA Group Health Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
County of Albany et al v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01650
Defendant:
Bausch Health Americas, Inc., Heritage Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
County of Schuyler, City of Mobile, WCA Group Health Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
People of the State of Illinois et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op46147
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
County of Schuyler, People of the State of Illinois and People of Schuyler County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
In Re: Pharmaceutical Industry
as 12-1067
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHIRLEY GELLER, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA, TWIN CITIES BAKERY WORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and others
:
COUNTY OF ORANGE, ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, M. JOYCE HOWE and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF VA, LARRY YOUNG and THERESE SHEPLEY
Movant - Appellant:
CORINNA CONNICK
Defendant - Appellee:
BAXTER PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., STANLEY C. HOPKINS, MONSANTO COMPANY and others
Defendant:
AGOURON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BIOGEN, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC and others
Interested Party - Appellee:
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE POLICY AND FINANCING, HUMANA, INC., CARDINAL HEALTH, INC. and others
Interested Party:
MILBERG LLP, PARMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Jermain King v. Don Schieferrdecker, et al
as 11-3225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERMAIN KING
Defendant - Appellee:
DON L. SCHIEFERRDECKER, Sheriff of Schuyler County, COUNTY OF SCHUYLER, JOE DORSEY, Supervisor, Security Therapy Aides, Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility and others
Jermain King v. Don Schieferrdecker, et al
as 11-3063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERMAIN KING
Defendant - Appellee:
DON L. SCHIEFERRDECKER, Sheriff of Schuyler County, COUNTY OF SCHUYLER, JOE DORSEY, Supervisor, Security Therapy Aides, Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility and others
In Re: Pharmaceutical Industry
as 10-1959
:
SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 537 TRUST FUNDS, BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF MASSACHUSETTS and SHEET METAL WORKERS UNION NATIONAL HEALTH FUND
Defendant - Appellant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
Appellant:
DONALD E. HAVILAND, JR.
Forjone v. The State of California
as 10-822
Plaintiff:
Wayne Mack, Dan DelPlato, Jr., Gabriel Razzano and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John-Joseph Forjone, the 42 USC 1983/Bivens/False Claims Act matter effecting the statewide distribution of HAVA funds requiring a 28 USC 2284 panel effecting New York Municipal People's equity in Bottom-up suffrage. Homerule autonomy and effecting real p
Defendant - Appellee:
The State of California, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively, The State of Oregon, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively, The State of New Mexico, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
