Cases 61 - 70 of 635
Crawley v. Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01820
Plaintiff:
Dinah L. Crawley
Defendant:
Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc. a Foreign Corporation doing business as Silverton Mortgage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1455
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ezra Alem v. William Ter-veen, et al
as 22-35328
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EZRA ALEM
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM TER-VEEN, Snohomish Deputy, CONSTANCE M. CRAWLEY, Snohomish County Prosecuting Attorney and DONALD M. VOIRET, Special Agent in Charge
USA v. Terence Crawley
as 22-5320
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TERENCE CRAWLEY
Jackson v. Peon et al
as 1:2022cv01726
Plaintiff:
Marco-Dane Jackson
Defendant:
Kasia Crawley, Hoffman Estates Police Department, Village of Hoffman Estates, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Alem v. Ter-veen et al
as 2:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Ezra Alem
Defendant:
William Ter-veen, Constance M Crawley and Donald M Voiret
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Timothy Crawley et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc et al
as 8:2022cv00251
Plaintiff:
Timothy Crawley and Jill Crawley
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc and Does 1-50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Crawley v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2022cv00058
Petitioner:
Terence Crawley
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Terence CrawleyIn re: Terence Crawley
as 22-5108
Petitioner:
In re: TERENCE CRAWLEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
