Cases 41 - 50 of 169
Mallory v. Crump Police Station et al
as 2:2021cv02402
Defendant:
Detective Robinson and Crump Police Station
Plaintiff:
Joshua Mallory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockhart v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2021cv00710
Defendant:
Alyssa D Emery, Erin Schaible, Joe Johnson #22 and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick O. Lockhart, K. L. and B. L.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03630
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jean Crump v. Social Security Administration et al
as 2:2020cv06010
Defendant:
Does 1-200, Mitch McConnell, Social Security Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Jean Crump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. O'BRIAN
as 4:2020cv00167
Defendant:
FRED O'BRIAN, HENRY MILLER, MORRIS A YOUNG and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY ALONZO and LARRY ALONZO HILL BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Range v. Van Metre et al
as 1:2020cv00123
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Stacey, Magistrate Judge Michael Nachmanoff and others
Plaintiff:
Davetta Lynn Range
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Champagne v. Crump
as 1:2019cv01076
Plaintiff:
Taran Champagne
Defendant:
Karin Crump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DESPAIGNE ZULVETA v. THE BARRETT FIRM, ET AL.
as 1:2019cv00978
Plaintiff:
ARMANDO DESPASAIGNE ZULVETA and ARMANDO DESPAIGNE ZULVETA
Defendant:
THE BARRETT FIRM, ERIK K. ENGLEBARDT, CLAWSON AND STAUBES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Crump v. City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2019cv00617
Defendant:
Baton Rouge Police Department, Joseph Welda, Sharon Weston Broome and others
Plaintiff:
Paulette Crump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Sullivan v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2019cv01017
Defendant:
Chief Alan Crump, Cody Hyde, City of Shreveport and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
