Cases 1 - 10 of 21
COX v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv11109
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL COX
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Acken v. Brumlow et al (TV1)
as 1:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Robert Acken
Defendant:
Donald Brumlow, Chuck Schmitt, Lynn Schmitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Evans et al v. Laurel County Board of Education et al
as 6:2021cv00196
Plaintiff:
Austin Evans
Defendant:
Laurel County Board of Education, Doug Bennett, Harmon Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Holliman v. Cox et al
as 5:2019cv00274
Plaintiff:
Antonio Terrell Holliman
Defendant:
Bradley Wilson, Pamela Meeks and Crystal Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2018cv00296
Plaintiff:
Crystal Cox and Tony A. Cox
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marc Randazza, et al v. Crystal Cox
as 15-15610
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARC J. RANDAZZA
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER RANDAZZA and NATALIA RANDAZZA
Defendant / Appellee:
CRYSTAL COX
Obsidian Finance Group, LLC, et al v. Crystal Cox
as 14-35744
Plaintiff - Appellee:
OBSIDIAN FINANCE GROUP, LLC and KEVIN D. PADRICK
Defendant - Appellant:
CRYSTAL COX
Obsidian Finance Group, LLC, et al v. Crystal Cox
as 14-35744
Plaintiff / Appellee:
OBSIDIAN FINANCE GROUP, LLC and KEVIN D. PADRICK
Defendant / Appellant:
CRYSTAL COX
Obsidian Finance Group, LLC, et al v. Crystal Cox
as 14-35730
Plaintiff - Appellee:
OBSIDIAN FINANCE GROUP, LLC and KEVIN D. PADRICK
Defendant - Appellant:
CRYSTAL COX
Obsidian Finance Group, LLC, et al v. Crystal Cox
as 14-35731
Plaintiff / Appellee:
OBSIDIAN FINANCE GROUP, LLC and KEVIN D. PADRICK
Defendant / Appellant:
CRYSTAL COX
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
