Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Wooten v. Sollie et al
as 3:2020cv00044
Defendant:
Cynthia Porter, K. Sellers, Casey Spears and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Charles Wooten
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00763
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Edmonson v. Robinson et al
as 3:2014cv00522
Plaintiff:
Kenny Franklin Edmonson
Defendant:
Laurie Robinson, Cynthia Porter, Mellisa McCarter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter et al v. Lifestyle Improvement Centers, LLC
as 2:2013cv00649
Plaintiff:
Patrick Porter and Cynthia Porter
Defendant:
Lifestyle Improvement Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AUGUST et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05826
Plaintiff:
CLARISSA AUGUST , CATHLEEN BAILEY , RICHARD BIRDWELL and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
August et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03103
Plaintiff:
Clarissa August , Cathleen Bailey , Richard Birdwell and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
August et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as CAN/4:13-cv-03103
Plaintiff:
Clarissa August , Cathleen Bailey , Richard Birdwell and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Johnson v. Granholm et al
as 2:2010cv10005
Plaintiff:
Richard Johnson
Defendant:
Jennifer Granholm, John Cherry, Attorney General and others
Villareal Pasaret v. Mullins et al
as 3:2009cv00430
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Villareal Pasaret
Defendant:
Isabel Mullins, Cynthia Porter, Jaime J. Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
