Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Stedroy Hurst v. VDOC
as 26-6793
Plaintiff:
STEDROY HURST
Defendant:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN DOE, Responsible for arranging and scheduling post-op, CHADWICK DOTSON, Director and others
Jackson v. West et al
as 3:2026cv00715
Plaintiff:
Damian Jackson
Defendant:
Patricia West, Lloyd Banks, Michelle Dermyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bussey v. VDOC Correspondence Unit et al
as 7:2026cv00594
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lynn Bussey, Jr.
Defendant:
VDOC Correspondence Unit, Donna Shifflett, Wendy K. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kluttz v. Dotson et al
as 2:2026cv00751
Plaintiff:
David Marc Kluttz
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, Joseph Walters, Barry Marano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Carpenter
as 2:2026cv12441
Plaintiff:
Felicia Lipscomb
Defendant:
Chadwick Carpenter
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Chadwick v. City Winery Chicago, LLC
as 1:2026cv08249
Plaintiff:
Thomas Chadwick
Defendant:
City Winery Chicago, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Bussey v. Shifflett et al
as 7:2026cv00553
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lynn Bussey, Jr.
Defendant:
Donna Shifflett, Chadwick Dotson and The Whole Correspondence Unit/Court & Legal Sections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bussey v. Dotson et al
as 7:2026cv00542
Petitioner:
Jeffery Lynn Bussey, Jr.
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson and Rick Alsbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00706
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
