Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Kai Ingram v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, et al
as 24-1532
Plaintiff:
KAI D. INGRAM
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI
(SS) Ingram v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Christine D. Ingram
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ingram v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv00455
Petitioner:
Kevin D Ingram
Respondent:
United States of America and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
INGRAM v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2023cv01591
Petitioner:
KEVIN D. INGRAM
Respondent:
UNITED STATES and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kai Ingram v. B. Rudzienski, et al
as 23-2145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAI D. INGRAM
Defendant / Appellee:
B. RUDZIENSKI, Greene Hearing Examiner
JACKSON v. GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY
as 5:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
LIQUETTA JACKSON
Defendant:
GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY, RANDY D INGRAM, R T TRUCKING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Kai IngramIn re: Kai Ingram
as 22-3216
Petitioner:
In re: KAI D. INGRAM
Respondent:
B. RUDZIENSKI, MICHAEL ZAKEN, S. DAVIS and others
INGRAM v. SCHWAB et al
as 2:2022cv01665
Plaintiff:
KAI D. INGRAM
Defendant:
COUNSELOR SCHWAB, SUPT. WILSON and JOHN/JOAN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kai Ingram v. Smithfield SCI, et al
as 22-1541
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAI D. INGRAM
Defendant / Appellee:
SMITHFIELD SCI
INGRAM v. RUDZIENSKI et al
as 2:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
KAI D. INGRAM
Defendant:
B. RUDZIENSKI, MICHAEL J. ZAKEN, S. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
