Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Bailey v. Marriott Hotel Services, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv08160
Plaintiff:
Marie Bailey
Defendant:
Marriott Hotel Services, LLC, Marriott International Inc. and The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Bailey v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv02463
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bailey
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Samuel Wendt v. Jamie Bullard
as 26-6985
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL CLEMENT WENDT
Defendant:
JAMIE BULLARD, SHAWNA BROWN, GLENDA JACKSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bailey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv00485
Plaintiff:
Rachel Bailey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Scott v. Milwaukee County Board of Supervisors et al
as 2:2026cv01689
Plaintiff:
Reginald M Scott
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Board of Supervisors, James Cox, Edward Bailey and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballard v. Brittingham et al
as 1:2026cv03680
Plaintiff:
DeAndre T. Ballard
Defendant:
Monika Brittingham and Assistant Warden William Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
