Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Flowers v. Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services Division of Child Support Services
as 4:2023cv00829
Plaintiff:
Elbert D Flowers
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services Division of Child Support Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Flowers v. Acuity Brands Lighting et al
as 3:2019cv02090
Defendant:
Cameron Goodwin, Polk NLN, Acuity Brands Lighting and others
Plaintiff:
Damion D Flowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00683
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Flowers v. Advantage Resources
as 3:2019cv00682
Plaintiff:
Damion D Flowers
Defendant:
Advantage Resources
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00684
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Capps v. Humphreys County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2013cv00256
Plaintiff:
Glenn Capps
Defendant:
Humphreys County, Tennessee, Chris Davis, David D. Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARIN v. FRAGEL et al
as 2:2012cv01676
Plaintiff:
MEL M. MARIN
Defendant:
JOSEPH FRAGEL, SHARON CITY, ROBERT LUCAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Melvin Marin v. Joseph Fragle, et al
as 11-1908
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN M. MARIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH FRAGLE, Individually, MIKE DONATO, VICTOR S. HEUTSCHE and others
Melvin Marin v. Joseph Fragel, et al
as 10-4797
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN M. MARIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH FRAGEL, Individually, MIKE DONATO, VICTOR S. HEUTSCHE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
