Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Gay v. Demonceaux et al
as 3:2026cv03322
Plaintiff:
Barri Gay
Defendant:
Jacquelyn Demonceaux and Eli Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
National Council of Nonprofits, et al v. McMahon, et al
as 26-1972
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF NONPROFITS, BOSTON, MA, ALBUQUERQUE, NM and others
Defendant:
LINDA MARIE MCMAHON, in the official capacity as Secretary of Education and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Interested Party:
MARYLAND LEGAL AID, GREATER BOSTON LEGAL SERVICES, AND OTHER CIVIL LEGAL AID ORGANIZATIONS, CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION, CLEANAIRE NC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10972
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Ruskowski et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2026cv07281
Plaintiff:
Kenneth M. Ruskowski, Tina Russak, Salvatore J. Russo and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Gay v. Blaser et al
as 3:2026cv03275
Plaintiff:
Barri Gay
Defendant:
K Blaser, . Jacobson, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gai v. Spring Manor Apartments, LLC
as 7:2026cv06807
Plaintiff:
Charlene Gai
Defendant:
Spring Manor Apartments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Persidilli et al v. Gay
as 4:2026cv06328
Plaintiff:
Gino Persidilli and Sahar Alrabadi
Defendant:
Gay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Burrage et al v. South Correctional Entity et al
as 2:2026cv02675
Plaintiff:
Malinda Gay Burrage and Skye Lee Burrage
Defendant:
South Correctional Entity, City of SeaTac, Devon Schrum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gay v. Steadman et al
as 5:2026cv01948
Plaintiff:
Mixon Edward Gay
Defendant:
Sean Steadman, Benjamin Hoffman, Tony Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
