Cases 1 - 10 of 17
SMITH v. LANIER et al
as 1:2020cv00750
Defendant:
OFFICER JENNINGS, HIGH POINT DETENTION CENTER INTAKE NIGHT SHIFT, OFFICER D. LANIER and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD D. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Gray v. James Tilton, et al
as 16-16809
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY GRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES TILTON, ROBERT WONG, MATTHEW CATES and others
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Lee et al
as 1:2015cv00296
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Stephanie E Lee and Orlando D Lanier
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Lanier v. Allconnect, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01954
Plaintiff:
Jamal D. Lanier
Defendant:
Allconnect, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Branch Bank and Trust Company v. Cathy Lanier
as 15-1051
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRANCH BANK AND TRUST COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
CATHY G. LANIER and RANDY D. LANIER
Defendant:
TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.
Branch Bank and Trust Company v. Cathy Lanier
as 14-1459
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRANCH BANK AND TRUST COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
CATHY G. LANIER and RANDY D. LANIER
Defendant:
TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.
Lanier v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2014cv00323
Petitioner:
Nicholas D. Lanier
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Branch Bank and Trust Company v. Technology Solutions Inc et al
as 3:2013cv01318
Plaintiff:
Branch Bank and Trust Company
Defendant:
Technology Solutions Inc, Cathy G Lanier and Randy D Lanier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv12721
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
