Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Phillips v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
April D Phillips
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Viewpoint Neutrality Now!, et al v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, et al
as 23-1346
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Viewpoint Neutrality Now!, Evan Smith and Isaac Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
Kendall J. Powell, Regent Chair, in their respective official capacities, Steven A. Sviggum, Regent Vice Chair, in their respective official capacities, Mary A. Davenport, Regent in their respective official capacities and others
Overland v. Synergies3 TEC Services, LLC
as 4:2021cv01008
Plaintiff:
Talon Overland, Daniel Murphy, Mike Baker and others
Defendant:
Synergies3 TEC Services, LLC, Benton Odom and Eric Atchley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Phillips v. Weekley
as 5:2020cv05169
Defendant:
Warden Weekley
Plaintiff:
Torey D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Weekley
as 4:2020cv01104
Plaintiff:
Torey Phillips and Torey D Phillips
Defendant:
Weekley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2017cv00299
Defendant:
Richard Brittenham, Doctor T. Chamberlain, Dr. J. Che and others
Plaintiff:
Jarrod D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Bowers et al
as 3:2017cv00097
Defendant:
K Bowers, T Harrell, B Ingram and others
Plaintiff:
Dexter Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockhart v. Bowers et al
as 3:2017cv00095
Plaintiff:
Marcus Lockhart
Defendant:
K Bowers, T Harrell, B Ingram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alston v. Bowers et al
as 3:2017cv00096
Defendant:
K Bowers, T Harrell, B Ingram and others
Plaintiff:
James Alston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv02144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
