Cases 21 - 30 of 30
David Stebbins v. Wes Bradford, et al
as 13-2689
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Anthony Stebbins
Defendant - Appellee:
Wes Bradford, State of Arkansas, Boone County Circuit Court and others
Stebbins v. Bradford, et al
as 3:2012cv03131
Plaintiff:
David A. Stebbins
Defendant:
Wes Bradford, State of Arkansas, Boone County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stebbins v. Stebbins et al
as 3:2012cv03130
Plaintiff:
David A. Stebbins
Defendant:
Rita F. Stebbins and David D. Stebbins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
v. Stebbins et al
as 2:2012cv03131
Plaintiff:
David A. Stebbins
Defendant:
Wes Bradford, State of Arkansas, Boone County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Otha James v. UTMB Medical Center & Pharmacy, et al
as 10-40913
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OTHA JAMES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH MEDICAL CENTER AND PHARMACY, CMC PHARMACY, C. KYLE and others
Otha James v. UTMB Medical Center, et al
as 10-40299
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OTHA JAMES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH MEDICAL CENTER AND PHARMACY, CMC PHARMACY, C KYLE and others
James v. UTMB Medical Center and Pharmacy et al
as 6:2009cv00489
Plaintiff:
Otha James
Defendant:
UTMB Medical Center and Pharmacy, CMC Pharmacy, C Kyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crosby v. Garza et al
as 1:2009cv00519
Plaintiff:
Larnell Crosby
Defendant:
J. Garza, T. Reyna, D. Wattree and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martin-Sanchez v. Stebbins, Sr. et al
as 4:2008cv00284
Plaintiff:
Miguel A Martin-Sanchez
Defendant:
Robert C. Stebbins, Sr. and Patty D. Stebbins
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Willie Tyrone Cooper v. Jeanne Woodford
as 1:2007cv00214
Plaintiff:
Willie Tyrone Cooper
Defendant:
Jeanne Woodford, George M Galaza, Mike Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
