Cases 11 - 20 of 1,446
Gipson v. Shinn et al
as 4:2022cv00480
Plaintiff:
Artis Gipson
Defendant:
David Shinn, D.W. Higginson, Jorge H Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kent Williams v. Leeflang, et al
as 22-35615
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENT GLEN WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
LEEFLANG, Paralegal, ROBBERT WHEILER, RICHARDSON, Warden and others
BANKS v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2022cv00602
Petitioner:
MITCHELL DANYELL BANKS
Respondent:
DANNY ROGERS, D.W. COOKE, W.M. EVANS and others
Defendant:
TRAVELERS CASUALTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kent Williams v. Leeflang, et al
as 22-35369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENT GLEN WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
LEEFLANG, Paralegal, ROBBERT WHEILER, RICHARDSON, Warden and others
Urena v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv01189
Plaintiff:
Amaury Urena
Defendant:
City of New York, Captain Pines, Captain Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Paralegal Lifang et al
as 1:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Paralegal Lifang, Robbert Wheiler, Warden Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crittington v. McFadden et al
as 3:2021cv00314
Defendant:
Garry L. McFadden, Savory Sheryl Drakeford, K. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Omar Dupraz Crittington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. TYSON et al
as 2:2021cv00256
Defendant:
DOCTOR BETTY, WARDEN SCHOOPPE, D.W. WHITE and others
Plaintiff:
HARRY THEODORE WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ward v. Sterling et al
as 0:2021cv00465
Defendant:
Sgt. Sprigner, Bryan Sterling, Joe Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Jody Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Kincade et al
as 2:2021cv00011
Defendant:
T.A. Carroll, Stacy Kincade, Shabaz and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
