Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Jaar v. Northern Genesis Acquisition Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv02155
Plaintiff:
Jacques Jaar
Defendant:
Northern Genesis Acquisition Corp., Ian Robertson, Paul Dalglish and others
Tron v. Robertson et al
as 3:2022cv08634
Plaintiff:
Sergio Tron
Defendant:
Ian Robertson, Ken Manget, Alex Rodrigues and others
Manning v. Embark Technology Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07526
Plaintiff:
Mr Robert Manning, II and Robert Manning, II
Defendant:
Embark Technology Inc., Ian Robertson, Ken Manget and others
Luberisse v. Robertson et al
as 3:2022cv05455
Plaintiff:
Josh Luberisse and Northern Genesis Acquisition Corp. II
Defendant:
Ian Robertson, Ken Manget, Alex Rodrigues and others
Minopoli v. Largo Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv12072
Plaintiff:
Mr. Salvatore Minopoli and Salvatore Minopoli
Defendant:
Largo Inc., Largo Clean Energy Corp., Paulo Misk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DALGLISH et al v. ELDREDGE LUMBER AND HARDWARE INC et al
as 2:2020cv00231
Plaintiff:
PRESTON DALGLISH and TERRY DALGLISH
Defendant:
MARVIN LUMBER AND CEDAR CO, ELDREDGE LUMBER AND HARDWARE INC, MARVIN COMPANIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Tyrone Wallace v. R. Olson, et al
as 17-55660
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
R. OLSON, RJD Appeals Coordinator, J. RAMIREZ, RJD Appeals Coordinator, J. DALGLISH, RJD Psychologist and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MP III Holdings, Inc., et al v. Hartford Casualty Ins Co
as 11-3071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MP III HOLDINGS, INC., PETER C MORSE and R. BRUCE DALGLISH
Defendant - Appellee:
HARTFORD CASUALTY INS CO
Dalglish v. Professional Computer Services, LLP
as 0:2010cv02161
Plaintiff:
Michael Dalglish
Defendant:
Professional Computer Services, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
