Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05530
Plaintiff:
DANYELL BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown v. Smoak et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2021cv00711
Plaintiff:
Octavious Danyell Brown
Defendant:
Jason Smoak, Spencer Downs, James Brazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rocio et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00836
Plaintiff:
VANESSA L. PEREZ, SCHARON NICHOLS, ERICA M. DAVIS and others
Defendant:
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc., NSK, LTD., NSK PRECISION AMERICA, INC. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Cheryl A Marshall, Valerie M Morris and Connie M Laredo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v Clarke
as 1:2019cv01416
Petitioner:
Danyel Brown
Respondent:
Harold C. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Armstrong et al v. American Camper Manufacturing, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv05574
Defendant:
American Camper Manufacturing, LLC, CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., Bechtel National Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Armstrong, Sandra Armstrong, Sandra Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Brown v. Bufford et al
as 9:2008cv03476
Plaintiff:
Corey Danyell Brown
Defendant:
Curtis Bufford and Kevin Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Armstrong et al v. American Camper Manufacturing, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00440
Plaintiff:
Sandra Armstrong, Tawanna Faye Armstrong, Roosevelt Armstrong, Jr. and others
Defendant:
American Camper Manufacturing, LLC, CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown v. Bufford et al
as 4:2008cv03476
Plaintiff:
Corey Danyell Brown
Defendant:
Curtis Bufford and Kevin Williams
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
