Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Ledford v. Hensley et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Randall Eugene Ledford
Defendant:
Mike Hensley, Walmart Unicoi, Aaron Embler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Edwards v. Gibbs et al
as 2:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
William Darrell Edwards
Defendant:
Debra Gibbs, Michael Upshaw, Timothy Fitzpatrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shambaugh & Son, L.P. v. Texo Industrial, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00135
Plaintiff:
Shambaugh & Son, L.P.
Defendant:
Carrie Lynn O'Neal, Darrell Edward O'Neal and Texo Industrial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRESSLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv33991
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL EDWARD PRESSLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CREWS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv16179
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL EDWARD CREWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv94313
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL EDWARD SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv23854
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL EDWARD SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders v. Payne
as 5:2019cv00324
Plaintiff:
Darrell Edward Sanders
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Colvin v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv01099
Plaintiff:
Craig Colvin
Defendant:
Officer Kenneth Young, Jr., Debra Kirby, City Of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rainey v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv05129
Defendant:
OFFICER MOSES-HUGHES, J. BOSAK, MATTHEW CADMAN and others
Plaintiff:
LEE RAINEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
