Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Garcia v. Elwell et al
as 1:2017cv00333
Petitioner:
Jermaine Garcia
Respondent:
Matthew Elwell, David Rivas , Steve Afeman and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Aiken et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia et al
as 1:2017cv00450
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Muslim World League, Saudi High Commission For Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina and others
Plaintiff:
Aiken, Yuly Botero, Nicholas Moukazis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Archuleta v. Rivas et al
as 1:2015cv00452
Respondent:
David Rivas and Pueblo of Santa Clara
Petitioner:
Ivan Archuleta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Garcia v. Rivas et al
as 1:2015cv00377
Petitioner:
Myron Garcia
Defendant:
David Rivas and Pueblo of Kewa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eiland v. City of Miami Gardens
as 1:2013cv21937
Plaintiff:
D'ANGELO EILAND
Defendant:
City of Miami Gardens , Jaina Luzmila Ucanan , Enrique David Rivas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennett v. Brandie
as 11-775
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald Bennett
Defendant - Appellee:
Judy Brandies, Detective of New Rochelle Police Dept. et al, David Rivas, Attorney of City Courts, New Rochelle, NY and Judith Elaine Permutt, Attorney of Eastchester N.Y. several Criminal City Courtrooms
Cruz et al v. Quiet Sweep, Ltd. et al
as 8:2010cv02455
Plaintiff:
German Carcamo Cruz , Alvaro Mena Rodriguez , Santiago Cornejo and others
Defendant:
Quiet Sweep, Ltd. and Steve Dekelbaum
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bennett v. Brandies et al
as 1:2010cv06307
Plaintiff:
Donald Mack Bennett
Defendant:
Judy Brandies, David Rivas and Judith E. Permutt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krebs v. Schriro et al
as 2:2010cv01281
Plaintiff:
Robert F Krebs
Defendant:
Dora B Schriro, David Rivas and Alfred Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
