Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Worley v. Broyles et al
as 5:2023cv00135
Plaintiff: David Worley
Defendant: Derran C Broyles, Carla Cannon, Sarah Sons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrell Woods v. Wesley Fluharty, et al
as 23-1340
Plaintiff / Appellant: Darrell Woods
Defendant / Appellee: Wesley Fluharty, John and Jane Doe 1, John and Jane Doe 2 and others
Woods v. Fluharty et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00175
Plaintiff: Darrell J. Woods, Sr.
Defendant: Wesley Fluharty, Jane/John Doe 1, Jane/John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE GEORGIA SENATE BILL 202
as 1:2021mi55555
Plaintiff: The New Georgia Project, Black Voters Matter Fund, Rise, Inc. and others
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger, Rebecca Sullivan, David Worley and others
Intervenor Defendant: National Republican Congressional Committee and Republican National Committee
Amicus Curiae: Amicus Curiae, American Center for Law and Justice, Foundation for Government Accountability and others
Petitioner: District of Columbia, Public Interest Legal Foundation, Senator Max Burns and others
Not Classified By Court: Clerk of the Superio Debra DeBerry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whiteside v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2021cv03618
Plaintiff: Solicitor General Brian W. Whiteside
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger, Rebecca N. Sullivan, David Worley and others
Intervenor Defendant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE and GEORGIA REPUBLICAN PARTY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301
The Concerned Black Clergy of Metropolitan Atlanta, Inc. et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2021cv01728
Plaintiff: Exousia Lighthouse International C.M., Inc., Sankofa United Church of Christ Limited, Greater Works Ministeries Network, Inc. and others
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger, Anh Le, Rebecca Sullivan and others
Intervenor Defendant: National Republican Congressional Committee, National Republican Senatorial Committee, Georgia Republican Party, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301
VoteAmerica et al v. Raffensperger et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01390
Plaintiff: Voter Participation Center, VoteAmerica and Center for Voter Information
Defendant: Anh Le, Brad Raffensperger, Rebecca Sullivan and others
Petitioner: National Republican Senatorial Committee, Republican National Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Asian Americans Advancing Justice-Atlanta v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2021cv01333
Defendant: Anh Lee, Brad Raffensperger, Rebecca Sullivan and others
Plaintiff: Asian Americans Advancing Justice-Atlanta, Thuy Hang Tran, Thao Tran and others
Intervenor Defendant: Georgia Republican Party, Inc., National Republican Senatorial Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sixth District of the African Methodist Episcopal Church et al v. Kemp et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01284
Defendant: Wandy Taylor, Tim McFalls, Rocky Raffle and others
Plaintiff: Georgia Muslim Voter Project, Latino Community Fund of Georgia, Women Watch Afrika and others
Intervenor Defendant: Republican National Committee, National Republican Senatorial Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301
The New Georgia Project et al v. Raffensperger et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01229
Plaintiff: Rise, Inc., Black Voters Matter Fund, The New Georgia Project and others
Defendant: Anh Le, Brad Raffensperger, Rebecca Sullivan and others
Amicus Curiae: Amicus Curiae
Petitioner: Georgia Republican Party, Inc., The Republican National Committee and National Republican Senatorial Committee
Intervenor Defendant: National Republican Congressional Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?