Cases 1 - 10 of 14
BOWENS v. SHIRDI SAINATH KRUPA LLC
as 2:2018cv01004
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH BOWENS
Defendant:
SHIRDI SAINATH KRUPA LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv03418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Bowen v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13576
Plaintiff:
Deborah Bowen
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Judd v. Obama et al
as 2:2013cv00537
Plaintiff:
Keith Judd
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Deborah Bowen and Democratic Party of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Perales v. Obama et al
as 3:2011cv00182
Defendant:
Richard Bruce Cheney, Peter Hoekstra, Christopher Samuel Bond and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perales et al v. United States Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2011cv02172
Petitioner:
Azael Dythian Perales
Respondent:
United States Internal Revenue Service, USA, U.S. Federal Bureau Of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perales v. United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv22833
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
United States of America , BP, Amoco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perales v. U.S. Marshal Service, et al
as 2:2011cv01621
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
U S Marshals Service, Central Intelligence Agency, Stacia Hylton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Azael Dythian Perales v. Orange County Sheriffs Department et al
as 8:2011cv00824
Respondent:
Don Bankhead, Patricia C Bates, Ben S Bernanke and others
Petitioner:
Azael Dythian Perales
Bowen et al v. Pfizer, Inc et al
as 2:2011cv01682
Plaintiff:
Deborah Bowen , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
