Cases 11 - 20 of 565
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Dees et al v. Zurlo et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lynn Dees and Ethan Davis Smith
Defendant:
Michael Zurlo, Jeffrey R. Brown, Jillian Knox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-4021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Agness McCurry v. D. Thomas, Jr., et al
as 23-6053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant / Appellee:
D. KELLY THOMAS, JR., Senior Judge, JOSEPH P. AHILLEN, Senior Assistant Attorney General, ROGER A. PAGE, Justice and others
Davis, et al v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 23-3244
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLA DAVIS and JALEN DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, in his official and individual capacities, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
ABRAHAM v. MCDOUGAL, et al.
as 1:2023cv00930
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ABRAHAM, SR.
Defendant:
TRAVIS MCDOUGAL, THOMAS ZOPODVA, C. A. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Vincent v. Cooke County, et al.
as 4:2023cv00884
Plaintiff:
Shawn Vincent
Defendant:
Sheriffs Deputy Wesley Dee Gentry and Cooke County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
