Cases 31 - 40 of 565
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv02356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
McClendon v. Bone et al
as 3:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Dee McClendon
Defendant:
John R. Bone, C. David Mecklin, Jr., Tisinger Vance P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv08331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Fedynich v. Pinn et al
as 3:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Nicole Fedynich
Defendant:
Godfrey T. Pinn, Jr., Central Virginia Housing Coalition Agency, Virginia Housing Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Fedynich v. Shaw et al
as 3:2023cv00229
Defendant:
Yvonne Farmer, Anton Shaw, Vonnie and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Fedynich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Valentine v. Gay
as 3:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Valentine
Defendant:
Dee David Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ivan Burley v. Sumner County 18th Judicial Drug Task Force, et al
as 23-5172
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IVAN ANTJUAN BURLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
SUMNER COUNTY 18TH JUDICIAL DRUG TASK FORCE, SUMNER COUNTY, TN, JASON ARNOLD, Officer and others
Katherine Fletcher v. Washoe County Human Services Agency, et al
as 23-15188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE DEE FLETCHER
Defendant / Appellee:
WASHOE COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY and MAX TRASK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
