Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Dean v. Caldwell Police Department, et al.
as 1:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean
Defendant:
Caldwell Police Department, Canyon County Sheriff Department, Deputy K. Curl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ODOMA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10319
Plaintiff:
DEMELO ODOMA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DEMELO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07184
Plaintiff:
LARRY DEMELO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TAYLOR v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04686
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TAYLOR, MARIO DEBARROS, ALPHADEL MCKEE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
William Taylor, Mario Debarros, Alphadel McKee and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Lafrance v. City of Fall River et al
as 1:2022cv10099
Plaintiff:
David Lafrance
Defendant:
City of Fall River, Jeffrey Cardoza, Michael Pessoa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DEMELO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv24663
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER DEMELO
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEMELO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv18288
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
ELBA DEMELO
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
