Cases 1 - 10 of 52
DeMelo v. Mulcahy
as 1:2026cv00033
Plaintiff:
Michael DeMelo
Defendant:
Kevin Mulcahy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Evans v. Superintendent
as 25-2958
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE EVANS
Defendant:
Correctional Officer ATKINS, Sergeant BELL, Sergeant REED and others
Antoniato et al v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, et al
as 2:2025cv11554
Plaintiff:
Maryann Antoniato, Lia Baldasano, Rudy Barrio and others
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company,, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Arkema Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DEMELO v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv01533
Petitioner:
MARIA DEMELO
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Prado-Demelo v. Droog et al
as 1:2024cv06411
Defendant:
Hillcrest Transportation, Inc. and Benjamin J. Droog
Plaintiff:
Felipe Prado-Demelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Dean v. Caldwell Police Department, et al.
as 1:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean
Defendant:
Caldwell Police Department, Canyon County Sheriff Department, Deputy K. Curl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ODOMA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10319
Plaintiff:
DEMELO ODOMA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DEMELO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07184
Plaintiff:
LARRY DEMELO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TAYLOR v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04686
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TAYLOR, MARIO DEBARROS, ALPHADEL MCKEE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
William Taylor, Mario Debarros, Alphadel McKee and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
