Cases 1 - 10 of 31
KELLY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv30138
Plaintiff:
DENNIS KELLY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Williams
as 23-10189
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Dennis Kelly Williams, also known as Dennis Williams
Kelly v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
as 2:2022cv02289
Plaintiff:
William Dennis Kelly
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Davis v. Kelly et al
as 6:2021cv02394
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jerome Davis
Defendant:
Dennis Kelly, Lonnie Smith, Chris Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Virgin Islands Port Authority
as 3:2020cv00090
Plaintiff:
Dennis Kelly
Defendant:
Virgin Islands Port Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelly et al v. Independent Quality Foods, L.L.C.
as 5:2020cv05067
Plaintiff:
Dennis Kelly and Steve Saterbo
Defendant:
Independent Quality Foods, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelly v. Toombs County Fire Department et al
as 6:2020cv00013
Plaintiff:
Mr. Dennis Kelly and Dennis Kelly
Defendant:
Toombs County Detention Center, Toombs County Fire Department, Darrel Corly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00580
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04441
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Acker et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia et al
as 1:2018cv06922
Defendant:
Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Plaintiff:
Richard Burban, Miroslaw Chrostowski, Michael Dee and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
