Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Williams v. Coleman et al
as 1:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Cortez Deon Williams
Defendant:
Lee S. Coleman and Brand Huffman
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv50455
Plaintiff:
DEON WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv48216
Plaintiff:
DEON WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deon Williams v. Abraham Benshetrit, et al
as 21-2154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEON WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
ABRAHAM BENSHETRIT, D.M.D. and SALTZ DENTAL CENTER
Williams v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00433
Plaintiff:
Steven Deon Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2020cv00043
Petitioner:
Cortez Deon Williams
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Andrew Alaniz, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 19-17103
Defendant / Appellee:
TANYA ROTHCHILD, Former Chief of the Classification Services Unit, TERESA SCHWARTZ, Former Director, Division of Adult Institutions, MATTHEW CATE, Former Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO MONTANO, SOKHA HINN, ANDREW ALANIZ and others
Jordan v. Williams et al
as 1:2019cv01146
Defendant:
Deon Williams and Maple Rice
Plaintiff:
Jackqueline M Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. BENSHETRIT et al
as 2:2019cv00797
Defendant:
ABRAHAM BENSHETRIT and THE SALTZ DENTAL CENTER
Plaintiff:
DEON WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
