Cases 1 - 10 of 15
King v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv05750
Plaintiff:
Derrick King
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
KING et al v. POGUE et al
as 2:2022cv02587
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Yolinda KING, Derrick KING, Sr. and Derrick KING, Jr.
Defendant:
Julee POGUE, ESTES GRADING & TRUCKING, LLC, ESTES GRADING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
King v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv05034
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Derrick King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
King v. Loar et al
as 2:2020cv14350
Defendant:
Sheriff Deryl Loar and Bryan Ballash
Plaintiff:
Derrick King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
King et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00949
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. BARD INC
Plaintiff:
Sherri L. King and Derrick King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dabney v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2020cv10329
Plaintiff:
Javon Dabney
Defendant:
Detective Patrick Cecile, Detective Donald Owen, Police Officer Derrick King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
King v. Yost et al
as 2:2019cv05522
Defendant:
David Anthony Yost, Kimberly Hall and Terri L Burns
Plaintiff:
Derrick King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. QUIGLEY et al
as 5:2018cv05312
Defendant:
WARDEN J. QUIGLEY, DEPUTY WARDEN SMITH, ICC JESSICA COLLINS and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. GONZLAS
as 5:2018cv05172
Defendant:
GONZLAS
Plaintiff:
DERRICK KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-15427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
