Cases 41 - 50 of 1,603
Julie A. Su v. Good Cash, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv10306
Defendant:
Marisela Romero, Good Cash, LLC, Good Cash and others
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Rosser v. Growin Estate LLC
as 8:2023cv02686
Plaintiff:
Dianna Rosser
Defendant:
Growin Estate LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rosser v. Growin Estate LLC
as 2:2023cv01107
Plaintiff:
Dianna Rosser
Defendant:
Growin Estate LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
GS Holistic LLC v. MD PRO INC et al
as 2:2023cv01777
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC and GS Holistic LLC
Defendant:
MD PRO INC doing business as Vape Line, Walid Hassan and Dianna Elmoussa
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Morrison et al v. Cigna et al
as 4:2023cv01378
Plaintiff:
Katherine Morrison and Dianna Morrison
Defendant:
Cigna, Cigna Group Insurance, Life Insurance Company of North America and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Huffin v. Kijakazi
as 7:2023cv01459
Plaintiff:
Dianna P. Huffin
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ploss v. Swampscott, Town of et al
as 1:2023cv12376
Plaintiff:
Dianna Ploss
Defendant:
Swampscott, Town of, Swampscott Police Department and Joseph Kable
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ploss v. Biggio et al
as 1:2023cv12360
Plaintiff:
Dianna Ploss
Defendant:
Andrew Biggio, Town of Winthrop, Massachusetts and Winthrop Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wang v. Hersha Hospitality Trust et al
as 1:2023cv08917
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Hersha Hospitality Trust, Neil H. Shah, Jackson Hsieh and others
Viradia v. Hersha Hospitality Trust et al
as 1:2023cv08820
Plaintiff:
Piyush Viradia
Defendant:
Hersha Hospitality Trust, Hasu P. Shah, Jay H. Shah and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
