Cases 31 - 40 of 241
Dickenson v. Clinton County Jail Indianan
as 4:2021cv00076
Plaintiff:
David Lee Dickenson
Defendant:
Clinton County Jail Indiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DICKENSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv38514
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA DICKENSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
County Board of Arlington County, Virginia et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc.
as 3:2021cv05294
Plaintiff:
County Board of Arlington County, Virginia, Fairfax County Board Of Supervisors, Chesterfield County, VA and others
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company Inc and McKinsey & Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
County Board of Arlington County, Virginia et al v. Mckinsey & Company, Inc.
as 1:2021op45072
Plaintiff:
Greensville County, VA, City of Fairfax, Virginia, City of Galax, Virginia and others
Defendant:
Mckinsey & Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DICKENSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv24152
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY J DICKENSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEAN v. J. BISSELL et al
as 2:2021cv09770
Defendant:
BELL JR., TOWNSHIP OF CEDAR GROVE, JOZSA and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN DEAN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
United States v. Charles Dickenson
as 21-1709
Defendant / Appellant:
Charles Dickenson
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
United States v. Charles Dickenson
as 21-1088
Defendant / Appellant:
Charles Dickenson
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kearney v. French et al
as 2:2020cv00578
Defendant:
Brandie French, Eastern State Hospital and Cheri Dickenson
Plaintiff:
Carlton Kearney, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
