Cases 1 - 10 of 707
Devol Pond Association, et al v. Capone, et al
as 24-2116
Defendant:
DANI LAFARRIER, PAUL JONCAS, MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and others
Plaintiff:
JANA DOES, CHRISTOPHER HADLEY, as an individual, DEVOL POND ASSOCIATION, a community group and 501(c)(3) and others
Interested Party:
MIIA PROPERTY AND CASUALTY GROUP, INC.
Stone v. Chelan County et al
as 1:2024cv03199
Plaintiff:
Brock Stone
Defendant:
Mariana Cabrera, Ashlyn Rediger, Cindy Dietz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01179
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dietz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv02499
Plaintiff:
Melanie L Dietz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02865
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Musgrove et al v. Blades et al
as 1:2024cv00532
Defendant:
Brad Little, Scott Brow, Dave Dietz and others
Plaintiff:
Theodore E Musgrove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. McKay, et al.
as 24-6370
Defendant:
BROTHER, HELD, SANABARIA and others
Plaintiff:
KENT WILLIAMS
Dietz v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv02732
Respondent:
Maryland Attorney General and Paige C. Jones
Petitioner:
John G. Dietz, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Byerly v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2024cv00418
Defendant:
Klinton R. Hust, Josh Tewalt, T. Valley and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bentley v. Dietz et al.
as 1:2024cv01509
Plaintiff:
Trena Bentley
Defendant:
Karl Dietz, PTL Jonathan Munn and Lieutenant Jim Colbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
