Labor Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 154
Lucero, Brenda et al v. Credit Union Retirement Plan Association et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00208
Plaintiff: Brenda L. Lucero, Heather Barton, Ilona Kompaniiets and others
Defendant: Credit Union Retirement Plan Association, The Board of Directors of the Credit Union Retirement Plan Association, The Board of Trustees of the Credit Union Retirement Plan Association and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Miller v. Packaging Corporation of America, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00271
Plaintiff: Harvey Miller and Todd K Lamunyon
Defendant: Packaging Corporation of America, Inc., The Board of Directors of Packaging Corporation of America, Inc., Benefits Administration Committee of The Packaging Corporation of America, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court: Facilitative Mediator
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Stengl et al v. L3Harris Technologies, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv00572
Plaintiff: Robert J Stengl, Daniel Will, Ronald F Kosewicz and others
Defendant: L3Harris Technologies, Inc., The Board of Directors of L3Harris Technologies, Inc., The Investment Committee of L3Harris Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Adams et al v. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic et al
as 1:2022cv00099
Plaintiff: Debra M Adams, Danillie L Mars, Michelle L Miller and others
Defendant: Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic, Board of Trustees of Dartmouth Hitchcock Clinic, Administrative Investment Oversight Committee of Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
KRUTCHTEN et al v. RICOH USA, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00678
Plaintiff: KEITH K KRUTCHTEN, ANGEL D. MURATALLA and WILLIAM BEGANI
Defendant: RICOH USA, INC., THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF RICOH USA, INC., RICOH RETIREMENT PLANS COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Williams et al v. Centene Corporation et al
as 4:2022cv00216
Plaintiff: Ruth Williams, Lisa Maule, Tovah Allen and others
Defendant: Centene Corporation, Board of Directors of Centene Corporation, Centene Corporation Retirement Plan Investment Committee and others
Amicus Curiae: U.S. Chamber of Commerce
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Fritton et al v. Taylor Corp. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2022cv00415
Plaintiff: Jason C. Fritton, Marea Gibson, Brian W. Motzenbeeker and others
Defendant: Taylor Corp., the Board of Directors of Taylor Corp., the Fiduciary Investment Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Barcenas et al v. Rush University Medical Center et al
as 1:2022cv00366
Plaintiff: John Barcenas, Mary Brown, Patrick Russo and others
Defendant: Rush University Medical Center, The Board of Trustees of Rush University Medical Center, The Rush University Medical Center Investment Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Norton et al v. Mass General Brigham Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv10045
Plaintiff: Mark Norton, Dashka Louis, Caroline Mitchell and others
Defendant: Mass General Brigham Incorporated, The Board of Directors of Mass General Brigham Incorporated, The Investment Committee of Mass General Brigham Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Mattson v. Milliman Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00037
Plaintiff: Joanna P. Mattson and Joanna P Mattson
Defendant: Milliman, Inc., The Board of Directors of Milliman, Inc., The Milliman Investment Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?