Cases 61 - 70 of 117
Donald Allen v. USA
as 14-15218
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD ALPHONSO ALLEN, AKA Donald Allen, AKA Donald A. Allen, AKA Sean McDonald
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Edwards v. USA
as 7:2013cv00113
Petitioner:
Donald Allen Edwards
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
In re: Motor Fuel Temperature
as 13-3220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESLEY DUKE
Plaintiff:
CHARLES COCKRELL, JR., MATHEW COOK, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, JONATHAN CHARLES CONLIN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., PORT CITIES OIL LLC, CASEY'S GENERAL STORE, INC. and others
Defendant:
ROLLIE BERRY, BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC. and BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Third-Party-Defendant - Appellee:
MOTIVA ENTERPRISES, LLC
Allen et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2013cv22383
Plaintiff:
Rena Allen and Donald Allen
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raines v. USA
as 1:2013cv00181
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Donald Allen Raines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
In re: Motor Fuel Temperature
as 13-602
Petitioner:
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., CIRCLE K STORES, INC, 7-ELEVEN, INC. and others
Respondent:
ZACHARY WILSON, on behalf of himself and all othes similarly situated, AMERICAN FIBER & CABLING, LLC, MATHEW COOK, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
In re: Motor Fuel Temperature
as 13-601
Respondent:
AMERICAN FIBER & CABLING, LLC, MATHEW COOK, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, BRENT DONALDSON, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Donald Allen v. USA
as 13-11146
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD ALLEN, a.k.a. New York
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
LOCK v. HANKS
as 1:2013cv00058
Respondent:
Warden CRAIG HANKS
Petitioner:
DONALD ALLEN LOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
