Cases 31 - 40 of 48
O'Donnal et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as WVS/2:13-cv-23602
Plaintiff:
Debbie O'Donnal and Kevin O'Donnal
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Donnally v. Nationstar Mortgage et al
as 3:2013cv01003
Plaintiff:
Mark Donnally
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, Ndex West, LLC, First American Title California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Robert Cornell v. Carol Schulte, et al
as 13-1664
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Allan Cornell
Plaintiff:
Donnalou M. Cornell
Defendant - Appellee:
Carol Schulte, Donald Hanson, Lula Hanson and others
Cornell et al v. Schulte et al
as 4:2012cv00137
Plaintiff:
Robert A Cornell and Donnalou M Cornell
Defendant:
Carol Schulte, Donald Hanson, Lula Hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donnals v. Vicoo Industry, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00206
Plaintiff:
Tim Donnals
Defendant:
Vicoo Industry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clay v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv00121
Petitioner:
Donnale C Clay
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Muhammad v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2011cv01890
Plaintiff:
Riki Rashaad Muhammad
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan, Mike Linderman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary Thompson v. NJ State Parole Board, et al
as 11-3356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NJ STATE PAROLE BOARD, DISTRICT #9, PAROLE BOARD MARCO, MARK MERINO and others
ANDREWS v. ATRUE
as 1:2011cv00080
Plaintiff:
DONNAL E. ANDREWS
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ATRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Acosta vs LeGrande et al
as 3:2011cv00030
Plaintiff:
Arturo E Acosta
Defendant:
Dr. William Donnally, LaGrande, Don Poag and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
