Cases 1 - 10 of 798
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DUBOSE et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC et al
as 3:2024cv06406
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN DUBOSE and AUDRA WORKS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DUBOSE et al v. CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY et al
as 1:2024cv06228
Plaintiff:
ZUMAR H. DUBOSE and URMAJESTY BANKTRUCKFIT SOLUTIONS INC.
Defendant:
CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY and NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DUBOSE v. FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE et al
as 2:2024cv02101
Plaintiff:
ZUMAR DUBOSE
Defendant:
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE and U.S. ATTORNEY OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdush Dubose, et al v. Attorney General United States of America, et al
as 24-1815
Plaintiff:
ABDUSH DUBOSE, ZUMAR DUBOSE and KARIEM BASEER DUBOSE
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Adamowicz v. Northwell Health Systems
as 24-1182
Plaintiff:
KAREN CRONIN, GENE ADAMOWICZ, MARY BEBBER and others
Defendant:
NORTHWELL HEALTH SYSTEMS
DUBOSE v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 2:2024cv01881
Plaintiff:
ZUMAR H DUBOSE
Defendant:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S.P.S. OIG and U.S. MARSHAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
DUBOSE v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 2:2024cv01694
Plaintiff:
ZUMAR H. DUBOSE
Defendant:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Adamowicz v. Northwell Health Systems
as 24-1084
Plaintiff:
MELANIE WEISS, GENE ADAMOWICZ, MARY BEBBER and others
Defendant:
NORTHWELL HEALTH SYSTEMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
