Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Wilson v. Damme et al
as 4:2026cv03220
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Wilson and Kevin Michael King
Defendant:
Jeffrey Damme, Megan Brandt, Sarah Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ware v. LaRue et al
as 4:2026cv00592
Plaintiff:
Supastar Ware
Defendant:
John LaRue, Jane Mosier, John Hartel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ware v. Valley et al
as 4:2026cv00513
Plaintiff:
Supastar Ware
Defendant:
John Valley, John Taylor, Terry Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Damme v. Tiffany & Bosco, PA
as 26-2061
Plaintiff:
ARMIN DIRK VAN DAMME
Defendant:
TIFFANY & BOSCO, PA
Powell v. Grajales
as 26-246
Plaintiff:
CHARLES POWELL, Light Rising Water and VALERIE POWELL
Defendant:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, N.A., HAROLD DAMM, Referee, Individual Capacity, NEWREZ, LLC and others
City of Bridgewater v. Roth et al
as 4:2026cv04015
Plaintiff:
City of Bridgewater
Defendant:
Eric Roth, Debra Roth and Pedro Lopez
Counter-Claimant:
Eric Roth and Debra Roth
Counter-Defendant:
City of Bridgewater, Micheal Damm and Bob Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Van Damme v. Thompson
as 1:2025cv13528
Plaintiff:
Tami Lynn Van Damme
Defendant:
David Allen Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv01251
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Van Damme v. National Default Servicing Corporation, et al.
as 25-6249
Plaintiff:
ARMIN VAN DAMME
Defendant:
NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING CORPORATION
Intervenor:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Damm v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2025cv07904
Plaintiff:
Christopher Damm
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
