Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Arthur v. Krause et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Danielle Arthur
Defendant:
Douglas Krause and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
United States v. Daniel Stewart
as 23-3582
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Daniel Arthur Stewart
ARTHUR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34401
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ARTHUR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sherbert et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04191
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Sherbert, Jerry Wayne Morris, Albert Mount and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
The Natasha Le Tubig Living Trust v. Gunningham
as 3:2023cv01545
Plaintiff:
The Natasha Le Tubig Living Trust
Defendant:
Daniel Arthur Gunningham and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Gunningham v. Tubig et al
as 3:2023cv01462
Defendant:
Natasha Tubig, Natasha Le Tubig and Jane Le
Plaintiff:
Daniel Arthur Gunningham
Sherbert et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00912
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Sherbert, Jerry Wayne Morris, Albert Mount and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Daniel HelevaIn re: Daniel Heleva
as 22-1956
Petitioner:
In re: DANIEL ARTHUR HELEVA
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONROE COUNTY
Daniel Heleva v. Faith Walter, et al
as 22-1762
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL ARTHUR HELEVA
Defendant / Appellee:
FAITH WALTER, Mailroom Supervisor, D. HINE, Mailroom Employee, KATHY BRITTEN, SCI Frackville Superintendent and others
Daniel Heleva v. Mark Matthews, et al
as 22-1161
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL ARTHUR HELEVA
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK S. MATTHEWS, ELMER CHRISTINE, JR. and DEMETRIUS W. FANNICK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
