Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Tiarra Abell et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05038
Plaintiff:
Tiarra Abell, Amelita Armendarez, Thomas Ash and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Abell et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00831
Plaintiff:
Abell, Tiarra Abell, Amelita Armendarez and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Abell et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00831
Plaintiff:
Tiarra Abell, Amelita Armendarez, Thomas Ash and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
WILDER v. BAXTER
as 1:2021cv02849
Plaintiff:
GREGORY WILDER
Defendant:
DANIELLE BAXTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Lauve, et al v. Janice Winfrey, et al
as 20-1349
Defendant / Appellee:
JANICE WINFREY, in her official capacity as Detroit City Clerk, DETROIT CITY COUNCIL and DANIEL BAXTER, in his official capacity as Director of Elections for City of Detroit Election Commission
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT DAVIS and JOHN LAUVE
Lauve et al v. Winfrey et al
as 2:2017cv12726
Plaintiff:
John Lauve and Robert Davis
Defendant:
Janice Winfrey , Daniel Baxter and Detroit City Council
Movant:
Lucinda Darrah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Baxter et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00076
Plaintiff:
Rachel Baxter and Larry Daniel Baxter
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gwendolyn Mingo v. Daniel Baxter
as 12-2368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GWENDOLYN MINGO
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL BAXTER, Director of Elections of the City of Detroit
Holmes et al v. Godinez et al
as 1:2011cv02961
Plaintiff:
Ralph Holmes , Daniel Baxter , George Childress and others
Defendant:
Salvador A Godinez and Rachel McKinzie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Baxter
as 4:2010mc00445
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Daniel Baxter
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
