Cases 11 - 20 of 33
CARROLL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv52281
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CARROLL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coston et al v. Conway et al
as 9:2019cv01552
Plaintiff:
Lando McMurren, Troy Derby, Tyvonni Purnell and others
Defendant:
Mahoney, Peterson, New York State Commission of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2019cv00604
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Complex Coleman-Medium, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Medical Department at FCC Coleman-Medium
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01089
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Carroll v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2019cv00562
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Medical Department at FCC Coleman-Medium
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Nanomech, Inc.
as 5:2019cv05055
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carroll
Defendant:
Nanomech, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spence et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11971
Plaintiff:
Brenda Stephens Pyant, Kristina Spence, Erick Carroll and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Schlissel et al v. The Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2018cv05331
Plaintiff:
Laurence Schlissel , Jude Laspa , Bruce Seeliger and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Carroll et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 5:2017cv02168
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carroll , Debra Grasl and Amanda Newsome
Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Carroll v. United States of America
as 3:2017cv00587
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carroll
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
