Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Nash v. Eves
as 7:2022cv00589
Plaintiff:
Allen Dewayne Nash
Defendant:
Deborah Damon, Chris Adkins, Carrie Painter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Rhodes et al
as 5:2022cv02291
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Daniel Martin
Defendant:
J Reuben Long Detention Center, Marcus Rhodes and Beth Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Brian Mahoney v. Warden Daniel Martin
as 21-7666
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRIAN EDWARD MAHONEY
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN DANIEL MARTIN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mahoney v. Martin
as 5:2021hc02150
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Respondent:
Warden Daniel Martin and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Scarborough et al
as 2:2019cv02901
Plaintiff:
Alluette Karen Jones
Defendant:
Andrew Michael Sullivan, Mikell R Scarborough, SRP 2011-6 LLC and others
Ihenachor v. Martin et al
as 1:2018cv00585
Plaintiff:
Evans Ihenachor
Defendant:
Paige Martin, Roberta Martin, Daniel Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Feagin v. City Of Baltimore et al
as 1:2017cv03474
Plaintiff:
Charles Feagin
Defendant:
City Of Baltimore, P.O. Charles Baugher, Jr., P.O. Steven Mahan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parker et al v. Coleman et al
as 4:2017cv00157
Plaintiff:
Cutrena Parker and Tyronne Williams
Defendant:
Ernest Coleman , David E. Tyson , Daniel Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maria Ferer v. Daniel Garasimowicz
as 13-2336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIA ISABEL FERER
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL MARTIN GARASIMOWICZ, JOHN DOE 1, VIRGINIA STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Ferrer v. Garasimowicz et al
as 1:2013cv00797
Plaintiff:
Maria Isabel Ferrer
Defendant:
Daniel Martin Garasimowicz, John Doe and The Virginia State Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
