Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv00792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Schofield v. Tiverton Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv00766
Plaintiff:
Billie-Russell Schofield
Defendant:
Tiverton Police Department, Town of Tiverton, Police Chief Thomas Blakey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maria Ferer v. Daniel Garasimowicz
as 13-2336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIA ISABEL FERER
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL MARTIN GARASIMOWICZ, JOHN DOE 1, VIRGINIA STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Ferrer v. Garasimowicz et al
as 1:2013cv00797
Plaintiff:
Maria Isabel Ferrer
Defendant:
Daniel Martin Garasimowicz, John Doe and The Virginia State Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
White, Jr. v. Martin
as 10-7064
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MAURICE WHITE, JR.
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL MARTIN, individually and while acting under color of law on behalf of the State of Oklahoma
Defendant:
KEVIN L. WARD, individually and while acting under color of law on behalf of the State of Oklahoma
White v. Martin et al
as 6:2009cv00287
Plaintiff:
Maurice White, Jr.
Defendant:
Daniel Martin and Daniel Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel Torres v. County of Riverside, et al
as 09-55462
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL MARTIN TORRES
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, SERGIO ALCALA, TONY BAUER and others
Daniel Martin Torres v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2008cv00102
Plaintiff:
Daniel Martin Torres
Defendant:
County of Riverside and Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
