Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Owen et al v. Hunt Southern Group, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00055
Plaintiff:
Daniel Owen , Kayla Owen and Saif Naber
Defendant:
Hunt Southern Group, LLC , Forest City Residential Management, LLC , Hunt MH Property Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Owen et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv01445
Plaintiff:
Karen Owen and Daniel Owen
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris v. Fallin et al
as 5:2016cv01297
Plaintiff:
Darrell Morris
Defendant:
Mary Fallin, Michael W Roach, Frazier Henke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv04013
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Complete Sports Medicine PTY LTD., Hong Wei Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Hoffman v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv05516
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Daniel Owen Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Roberts v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2014cv00103
Plaintiff:
Daniel Owen Roberts
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Francis Owens v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-1111
Petitioner:
FRANCIS DANIEL OWENS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ralph Daniel Owen v. San Bernardino County
as 5:2010cv01047
Plaintiff:
Ralph Daniel Owen
Defendant:
San Bernardino County
Owens v. Polk County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2009cv00511
Plaintiff:
Daniel Owens
Defendant:
Polk County Sheriff Department, Donna Johnson and Tim Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
