Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Standard Process, Incorporated v. Antitrend LLC, et al
as 20-1205
Defendant / Appellant: DANIEL EARLE and ANTITREND LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee: STANDARD PROCESS, INCORPORATED
McDermott v. State of Idaho et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00432
Defendant: Jonathan Medena, Patrick Owen, State of Idaho and others
Plaintiff: Jason Ryan McDermott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albright v. US
as 19-2316
Plaintiff: TRACY J. KEEGAN, STUART HOFFMAN, BENJAMIN H. HATHAWAY and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL EARL HIGGINS, III, ZELDA L. OPOKA and MICHAEL J. OPOKA
Standard Process Inc. v. The Antitrend LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00099
Plaintiff: Standard Process Inc.
Defendant: John Does 1-100, Daniel Earle and The Antitrend LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv15699
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
USA v. Daniel Wilson, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-60569
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DANIEL EARL WILSON, JR.
KAIGHN v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT CORRECTIONS
as 1:2016cv06499
Plaintiff: DANIEL EARL KAIGHN
Defendant: GLOUCESTER COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Daniel Johnson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-4364
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DANIEL EARL JOHNSON
USA v. Daniel Eyster
as 14-4641
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DANIEL EARL EYSTER, a/k/a Daniel Eyster
Reed v. Johnson, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00294
Plaintiff: Terry Reed
Defendant: Doug Johnson and Daniel Earles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?