Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Smith v. City of Bessemer et al
as 2:2026cv01497
Plaintiff:
Regina Marie Smith
Defendant:
City of Bessemer, Kenneth E. Gulley, Michael Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Christopher Ward, Sr.
as 25-14343
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER DANIEL WARD, SR.
Best Choice Roofing Franchising, LLC v. BCR Contractors of Arkansas, LLC et al
as 3:2025cv01016
Petitioner:
Best Choice Roofing Franchising, LLC
Respondent:
BCR Contractors of Arkansas, LLC and Daniel Ward
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Karen Tucker v. Marc Simon, et al
as 25-1897
Plaintiff:
KAREN TUCKER
Defendant:
MARC I. SIMON, ESQ., SIMON & SIMON PC, JON DOE(S) ASSOCIATES and others
FRYE et al v. BOWMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
DAVID FRYE, Ward Daniels, INDIANA LABORERS WELFARE, PENSION, TRAINING AND DEFINED CONTRIBUTION TRUST FUNDS and others
Defendant:
BOWMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Adams v. Fabrizio et al
as 0:2024cv60303
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Adams
Defendant:
Officer Ryan Fabrizio, Sergeant Steve Lambert, Detective Eddy Velazquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WARD v. USA
as 1:2023cv01953
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WARD
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
WARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv17400
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Karen Tucker v. Marc Simon, et al
as 23-2465
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAREN TUCKER
Defendant / Appellee:
MARC I. SIMON, Esq., SIMON & SIMON PC, ZACK WILDSMITH and others
Ward v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2023cv01738
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ward
Defendant:
Monsanto Company and JOHN DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
