Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Daniel Warren v. Pennsylvania Board of Probatio, et al
as 19-1818
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL WARREN
Defendant / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY
In re: Daniel Warren
as 19-1306
Petitioner:
In re: DANIEL WARREN
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY
WARREN v. LEHIGH COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 5:2018cv04921
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WARREN
Defendant:
ANDREA E. NAUGLE, LEHIGH COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, DOUGLAS G. REICHLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARREN v. OVERMYER et al
as 5:2018cv04922
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH, MICHAEL OVERMYER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
DANIEL WARREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Billingsley et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2018cv05309
Plaintiff:
Marsha Mundinger, Stacy Allen King, Kristin Leigh Heath and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Billingsley et al v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2018cv00135
Plaintiff:
Marsha Mundinger, Stacy Allen King, Kristin Leigh Heath and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leblanc et al v. Woods et al
as 1:2018cv00901
Defendant:
Horace Mann Insurance Company, Benny Woods, ZA Construction and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Warren and Deree Leblanc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01023
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alvarez et al v. Centraarchy Restaurant Management Company
as 2:2018cv00125
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Alvarez , William Askins , Rachel Brown and others
Defendant:
Centraarchy Restaurant Management Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wallace v. Riggs et al
as 2:2017cv04126
Plaintiff:
Martice Deshawn Wallace
Defendant:
Todd Riggs and Daniel Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
