Cases 1 - 10 of 12
ROBERTS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv47738
Plaintiff:
DAVE ROBERTS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mayes v. Davis School District et al
as 1:2019cv00040
Plaintiff:
Brenda Mayes
Defendant:
Dave Roberts, John Naisbitt and Davis School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaspar Physical Therapy, Inc. et al v. Roberts et al
as 3:2017cv02051
Plaintiff:
Gaspar Physical Therapy, Inc. and Brian Stone
Defendant:
David W. "Dave" Roberts , Re-Elect Supervisor Dave Roberts 2016 and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alfonso Pew v. Joanne Torma, et al
as 14-3716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant - Appellee:
JOANNE TORMA, DAVE ROBERTS, T'SHANNA KYLER and others
PEW v. TORMA et al
as 2:2014cv00984
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant:
JOANNE TORMA, DAVE ROBERTS, T'SHANNA KYLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kalch et al v. DKS Ventures, LLC et al
as 6:2011cv03208
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Joyce Essenburg Kalch and Steven Louis Kalch
Defendant:
DKS Ventures, LLC , Kevin W. Roberts , Stuart A. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alfonso Pew v. Joanne Torma, et al
as 11-1455
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant - Appellee:
JOANNE TORMA, Central Office Department of Corrections Religious Accomodations Board for Special Needs, DAVE ROBERTS, Unit Manager, Bureau of Inmate Services Central Office of Department of Corrections, T'SHANA KYLER, Department of Corrections Grievance Final Review Board and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
