Cases 1 - 10 of 200
Curtis Perry v. Well-Path, et al
as 23-2165
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS PERRY
Defendant:
WELL-PATH, Connected Care Solutions, SCI PHOENIX MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, SCI PHOENIX MEDICAL DIRECTOR and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH J. SILVA, Director, ESTATE OF DR STEPHEN D WIENER, DEPUTY MANDY SIPPLE and others
Lowery et al v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2021cv03107
Defendant:
Todd Thomason, James Colgan, (fnu) (lnu) and others
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Wallingford, Ramaun Johnson, John E. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GERHOLT v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv04079
Defendant:
WELLPATH, JOHN WETZEL, STEPHEN ST. VINCENT and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN GERHOLT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. David Lee Thomas, Jr.
as 16-7707
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID LEE THOMAS, JR.
Thomas v. Harris County, Texas
as 4:2016cv02121
Plaintiff:
David J Thomas, Jr
Defendant:
Harris County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. USA
as 1:2016cv00857
Petitioner:
DAVID LEE THOMAS, JR
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. David Thomas, Jr.
as 11-6866
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID LEE THOMAS, JR.
THOMAS v. USA
as 1:2010cv00694
Petitioner:
DAVID LEE THOMAS, JR
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
THOMAS v. USA
as 1:2010cv00608
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DAVID LEE THOMAS, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Saeed Hatim, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 10-5048
Petitioner - Appellee:
Saeed Mohammed Saleh Hatim, Detainee, Camp Delta, Ali Mohammed Saleh Al-Salahi, as next friend of Saeed Mohammed Saleh Hatim, Mohammed Nasser Yahia Abdullah Khussrof, Detainee, Camp Delta and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Robert M. Gates, Secretary, U. S. Department of Defense, David M. Thomas, Jr., Tom Copeman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
